Epoch 158 compensation payout from gov module (batch vesting)

2/4

Ценность для сети

Restoring compensation for lost epoch 158 preserved weights plausibly supports network fairness and operator trust, but the proposal text provides only a brief claim and no dedicated problem statement, incident analysis, or why-now rationale beyond the governance context.

2/4

Ясность плана

The payout method is partially clear: a per-weight conversion rate, lost-weight comparison, rounding, minimum payout handling, and executable messages are described. However, the evidence corpus does not include the full recipient list, per-recipient amounts, acceptance checks, exclusions, or a verification path that lets reviewers reproduce recipient correctness.

1/4

Доверие к команде

The proposer address is visible, but there is no named accountable owner, no evidence of prior similar restitution execution, no stated capacity, and no reporting/escalation path for disputes or corrections. The governance vote outcome is not delivery proof.

2/4

Дисциплина финансирования

There is a payout formula and total amount, but funding discipline is weakened by missing recipient-level audit data in the extracted evidence, an added fixed 500 GNK author payment, and minimum-payout adjustments that change strict proportionality. These may be acceptable only if explicitly justified and auditable.

1/4

Риски и stewardship

Executable payout risk is real because funds move to 138 recipient-like addresses, but the proposal does not show dispute handling, appeals, exclusions, independent verification, or mitigation if addresses/amounts are wrong. Conflicts are also not separately disclosed in the governance text, despite the formula including a fixed author payment.