Gonka Community Fund
governance: успешенНужны правки

Community Series Film — Why Gonka Exists

Saccade Media House is a creative team of tech entrepreneurs who know how to tell stories. We've built content for international tech brands and the founders behind them. We propose a Community Series — a film about why Gonka exists and who stands behind it. The goal: a viewer walks away thinking — "this is something real, I want to be part of it." Timeline: 30–35 days, Cinematic approach. Duration: 7–10 minutes. Budget: 31,250 GNK. We believe AI content overload will trigger a quality Renaissance. We build for the ones who stay. After the first film, we'll invite the community to a creative session — to define the priority audience and shape the top 3 narrative themes for what comes next. Before you vote — we made something for you: an awareness video, three shorts as a gift, and a full breakdown of our approach. Link: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVG6L2uvQ=/

Мнение по proposal

AI-черновик

Что говорит ревью

The proposal asks for 31,250 GNK from the community pool to fund Saccade Media House producing a 7–10 minute cinematic film about why Gonka exists, on a 30–35 day timeline. The proposed output could plausibly help awareness and community storytelling, but the submitted evidence is not strong enough for an unconditional Community Fund allocation: the problem, target audience, measurable outcomes, budget breakdown, tranches, reporting path, conflict disclosures, and delivery proof are missing or weak. The linked Miro board may contain important supporting detail, but it is auth-bound in the supplied corpus and cannot be credited without a snapshot.

  • The proposal has a plausible network-facing creative deliverable, but not a verifiable network outcome.
  • Budget discipline is materially insufficient: total ask is stated, but no breakdown or tranche logic is provided.
  • Team capability and prior work are mostly self-reported, and key supporting materials are auth-bound.
Открыть публичное ревью

Запрос

31 250 GNK

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1snq0m4rdvq0sswm03r5jsmtzw3p384qsy3l4t4; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Подано

9 апр. 2026 г.

Что думает коммьюнити

AI opinion - стартовая позиция. Ответы ниже помогают другим понять согласие, возражения и готовность голосовать.

Согласен

0

Согласен с условиями

0

Не согласен

0

Нужно больше данных

0

Ваше мнение

Governance голосование закрыто

Protocol result/status: успешен. Здесь еще можно оставить публичный комментарий, но голосование уже не активно.

Отношение к AI opinion
Если голосовать сейчас
Посмотреть governance result

Все ответы

Ответов пока нет. Можно быть первым.

Proposal простыми словами

О чем это

Saccade Media House is a creative team of tech entrepreneurs who know how to tell stories. We've built content for international tech brands and the founders behind them. We propose a Community Series — a film about why Gonka exists and who stands behind it. The goal: a viewer walks away thinking — "this is something real, I want to be part of it." Timeline: 30–35 days, Cinematic approach. Duration: 7–10 minutes. Budget: 31,250 GNK. We believe AI content overload will trigger a quality Renaissance. We build for the ones who stay. After the first film, we'll invite the community to a creative session — to define the priority audience and shape the top 3 narrative themes for what comes next. Before you vote — we made something for you: an awareness video, three shorts as a gift, and a full breakdown of our approach. Link: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVG6L2uvQ=/

Запрос

31 250 GNK

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1snq0m4rdvq0sswm03r5jsmtzw3p384qsy3l4t4; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Почему это важно

Not provided as a dedicated network-level value field. Source summary: Saccade Media House is a creative team of tech entrepreneurs who know how to tell stories. We've built content for international tech brands and the founders behind them. We propose a Community Series — a film about why Gonka exists and who stands behind it. The goal: a viewer walks away thinking — "this is something real, I want to be part of it." Timeline: 30–35 days, Cinematic approach. Duration: 7–10 minutes. Budget: 31,250 GNK. We believe AI content overload will trigger a quality Renaissance. We build for the ones who stay. After the first film, we'll invite the community to a creative session — to define the priority audience and shape the top 3 narrative themes for what comes next. Before you vote — we made something for you: an awareness video, three shorts as a gift, and a full breakdown of our approach. Link: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVG6L2uvQ=/

Проблема

Not provided as a dedicated problem/bottleneck field. Source summary: Saccade Media House is a creative team of tech entrepreneurs who know how to tell stories. We've built content for international tech brands and the founders behind them. We propose a Community Series — a film about why Gonka exists and who stands behind it. The goal: a viewer walks away thinking — "this is something real, I want to be part of it." Timeline: 30–35 days, Cinematic approach. Duration: 7–10 minutes. Budget: 31,250 GNK. We believe AI content overload will trigger a quality Renaissance. We build for the ones who stay. After the first film, we'll invite the community to a creative session — to define the priority audience and shape the top 3 narrative themes for what comes next. Before you vote — we made something for you: an awareness video, three shorts as a gift, and a full breakdown of our approach. Link: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVG6L2uvQ=/

Что должно быть сделано

  • Unstructured governance deliverable
Детали оценкиShow
Нужны правкиAI-черновик

Framework score v2

Простое ревью

The proposal asks for 31,250 GNK from the community pool to fund Saccade Media House producing a 7–10 minute cinematic film about why Gonka exists, on a 30–35 day timeline. The proposed output could plausibly help awareness and community storytelling, but the submitted evidence is not strong enough for an unconditional Community Fund allocation: the problem, target audience, measurable outcomes, budget breakdown, tranches, reporting path, conflict disclosures, and delivery proof are missing or weak. The linked Miro board may contain important supporting detail, but it is auth-bound in the supplied corpus and cannot be credited without a snapshot.

Доказательства

средние

Команда

провал

Блокеры

4

Почему такое мнение

  • The proposal has a plausible network-facing creative deliverable, but not a verifiable network outcome.
  • Budget discipline is materially insufficient: total ask is stated, but no breakdown or tranche logic is provided.
  • Team capability and prior work are mostly self-reported, and key supporting materials are auth-bound.

Пять публичных проверок

1/4

Ценность для сети

A Gonka awareness film could plausibly create network-level value, but the proposal does not define a concrete bottleneck, priority audience, distribution plan, why-now rationale, or measurable network outcome beyond a viewer impression goal.

1/4

Ясность плана

The proposal identifies a film length and timeline, but lacks acceptance criteria, exclusions, distribution commitments, success metrics, baseline, target, measurement method, reporting cadence, and a verifiable delivery checklist.

1/4

Доверие к команде

Saccade Media House is named and claims relevant experience, but the supplied corpus contains no independent proof of similar work, no named individual owner, no contact/reporting path, and no capacity commitment for this exact scope.

0/4

Дисциплина финансирования

The ask amount is clear, but it is a lump-sum community pool spend with no itemized production budget, pricing logic, milestones, tranches, payment holdback, refund conditions, or opportunity-cost analysis.

1/4

Риски и stewardship

The proposal does not disclose conflicts, rights/licensing, distribution ownership, use of community funds if delivery fails, post-delivery hosting/handover, or risk mitigations. The auth-bound Miro board is also a source-preservation risk because its contents cannot be verified from the supplied corpus.

Оценка команды

Team confidence is weak for this exact ask. A responsible entity is named, but the proposal relies on self-description rather than verifiable proof, does not name an accountable delivery lead, and lacks a reporting or escalation path.

Ответственный

вопрос

Saccade Media House is named, but no individual delivery owner, signer-recipient relationship, or contact path is provided in the extracted proposal text.

Релевантные доказательства

вопрос

The team claims prior content work for international tech brands and founders, but no portfolio, references, client examples, or extracted supporting materials are available in the supplied corpus.

Ресурсы и capacity

вопрос

A 30–35 day timeline is stated, but staffing, roles, hours, production schedule, dependencies, and availability are not disclosed.

Accountability path

провал

No reporting cadence, delivery acceptance process, escalation path, refund/holdback mechanism, post-delivery owner, or community review process is specified in the usable materials.

Условия

  • Provide a public snapshot or accessible copy of the Miro board, including the awareness video, shorts, portfolio examples, and approach breakdown, so reviewers can verify the evidence.
  • Name the accountable delivery owner, recipient address owner, team members/roles, contact path, reporting cadence, and acceptance decision process.
  • Define measurable success criteria: target audience, distribution channels, release date, baseline, target views/watch time/completion rate/community conversions, and measurement method.

Блокирующие проблемы

  • Нет измеримого результата: The stated goal is a desired viewer impression, but there are no baseline, target, measurement method, distribution metrics, conversion metrics, or post-release evaluation criteria.
  • Нет бюджетной или tranche-логики: The proposal gives a total ask and executable spend but no budget breakdown, milestone gating, tranche release, or acceptance-based payment structure.
  • Ключевые утверждения не подтверждены: The proposal relies on self-reported creative capability and prior work, while the linked Miro board containing supporting material is auth-bound and unavailable for scoring.
Источники и доказательстваShow

governance 39

SUCCEEDED

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/39

Evidence used in the opinion

Governance executable messages

1 executable message; types: /cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.MsgCommunityPoolSpend; actions: COMMUNITY_POOL_SPEND; funds: 31250000000000 ngonka; 1 recipient-like address

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/39

Gonkascan governance proposal

Canonical governance proposal source.

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/39

Governance proposal metadata

Metadata URL attached to the protocol governance proposal.

https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVG6L2uvQ=/