Gonka Community Fund

Proposal простыми словами

О чем это

test proposal - 测试方案

Запрос

Governance proposal includes executable coin movement, but the token denomination is not mapped to a review currency: 1000000000000 ibc/115F68FBA220A028C6F6ED08EA0C1A9C8C52798B14FB66E6C89D5D8C06A524D4.

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1hwyjwehgp6e5pgpg0ye4a7unwu5q9xzljpuwr5; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Почему это важно

Not provided as a dedicated network-level value field. Source summary: test proposal - 测试方案

Проблема

Not provided as a dedicated problem/bottleneck field. Source summary: test proposal - 测试方案

Что должно быть сделано

Unstructured governance deliverable

ОтклонитьAI-черновик

Framework score v2

Простое ревью

I would not allocate Community Fund or governance-controlled network capital to this proposal as written. The proposal text is only “test proposal - 测试方案,” while the executable message would execute a CosmWasm contract call with 1000000000000 of an unmapped IBC denomination and a recipient-like address. There is no stated network problem, outcome, safety analysis, accountable owner, or verification path.

Доказательства

высокие

Команда

провал

Блокеры

Почему такое мнение

The proposal has no stated network-level outcome.
The executable message moves funds without enough explanation or safety review.
There is no accountable owner, delivery proof, or accountability path.

Пять публичных проверок

0/4

Ценность для сети

The proposal states no concrete Gonka network problem, opportunity, beneficiary, or timing rationale.

0/4

Ясность плана

The only prose is a test title/body, with no deliverables, acceptance criteria, metrics, or exclusions.

0/4

Доверие к команде

Only a proposer address is visible, and no accountable owner or relevant delivery proof is provided.

0/4

Дисциплина финансирования

The executable includes coin movement, but the denomination, recipient purpose, budget logic, and tranche controls are not explained.

0/4

Риски и stewardship

The proposal gives no contract safety review, blast-radius analysis, rollback plan, monitoring plan, or conflict disclosure.

Оценка команды

Team confidence is not established for this exact executable action.

Ответственный

провал

A proposer address is present, but no named accountable owner or entity is provided.

Релевантные доказательства

провал

No evidence of similar protocol execution or stewardship is included.

Ресурсы и capacity

неясно

The proposal gives no staffing, operational capacity, or commitment information.

Accountability path

провал

There is no reporting, contact, maintenance, escalation, or post-execution accountability path.

Условия

Replace the test text with a concrete problem statement, intended protocol outcome, and why this change is necessary now.
Provide the full executable message details, including target contract, call payload, recipient, funds, and expected state changes.
Map the IBC denomination to a reviewable asset and explain the amount, recipient rationale, and whether this is a transfer, contract funding, or other action.

Блокирующие проблемы

Нет ответственного owner: The proposal identifies only a proposer address and no accountable delivery owner.
Нет измеримого результата: No baseline, target, metric, or verification method is provided.
Нет бюджетной или tranche-логики: The executable coin movement has no stated purpose, valuation, recipient rationale, or controls.

test proposal - 测试方案

О чем это

Простое ревью

Источники