Gonka Community Fund
governance: успешенНужны правки

Increase minimum governance deposit to 500 GNK and expedited minimum deposit to 1000 GNK

Increase the minimum deposit required to submit a governance proposal to 500 GNK (500,000,000,000 ngonka) and expedited minimum deposit to 1000 GNK (1,000,000,000,000 ngonka). This resubmits proposal #69 which passed community vote but failed to execute due to incomplete governance parameter specification.

Мнение по proposal

AI-черновик

Что говорит ревью

This proposal makes a clear executable governance-parameter change: raise the standard minimum deposit to 500 GNK and expedited minimum deposit to 1000 GNK. The change is verifiable on-chain, but the proposal gives little evidence for why these levels are right, how they affect fair participation, or what problem they solve beyond resubmitting a prior failed execution.

  • The executable parameter change is clear and on-chain verifiable.
  • The proposal lacks evidence that these deposit levels solve a measured governance problem.
  • Participation fairness and capture-risk tradeoffs are not addressed.
Открыть публичное ревью

Запрос

500 GNK

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1337v0tk0ng0dhmz2pk9qv0gsvpe48eafppc6u8; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Подано

10 июн. 2026 г.

Что думает коммьюнити

AI opinion - стартовая позиция. Ответы ниже помогают другим понять согласие, возражения и готовность голосовать.

Согласен

0

Согласен с условиями

0

Не согласен

0

Нужно больше данных

0

Ваше мнение

Governance голосование закрыто

Protocol result/status: успешен. Здесь еще можно оставить публичный комментарий, но голосование уже не активно.

Отношение к AI opinion
Если голосовать сейчас
Посмотреть governance result

Все ответы

Ответов пока нет. Можно быть первым.

Proposal простыми словами

О чем это

Increase the minimum deposit required to submit a governance proposal to 500 GNK (500,000,000,000 ngonka) and expedited minimum deposit to 1000 GNK (1,000,000,000,000 ngonka). This resubmits proposal #69 which passed community vote but failed to execute due to incomplete governance parameter specification.

Запрос

500 GNK

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1337v0tk0ng0dhmz2pk9qv0gsvpe48eafppc6u8; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Почему это важно

Not provided as a dedicated network-level value field. Source summary: Increase the minimum deposit required to submit a governance proposal to 500 GNK (500,000,000,000 ngonka) and expedited minimum deposit to 1000 GNK (1,000,000,000,000 ngonka). This resubmits proposal #69 which passed community vote but failed to execute due to incomplete governance parameter specification.

Проблема

Not provided as a dedicated problem/bottleneck field. Source summary: Increase the minimum deposit required to submit a governance proposal to 500 GNK (500,000,000,000 ngonka) and expedited minimum deposit to 1000 GNK (1,000,000,000,000 ngonka). This resubmits proposal #69 which passed community vote but failed to execute due to incomplete governance parameter specification.

Что должно быть сделано

  • Unstructured governance deliverable
Детали оценкиShow
Нужны правкиAI-черновик

Framework score v2

Простое ревью

This proposal makes a clear executable governance-parameter change: raise the standard minimum deposit to 500 GNK and expedited minimum deposit to 1000 GNK. The change is verifiable on-chain, but the proposal gives little evidence for why these levels are right, how they affect fair participation, or what problem they solve beyond resubmitting a prior failed execution.

Доказательства

средние

Команда

провал

Блокеры

3

Почему такое мнение

  • The executable parameter change is clear and on-chain verifiable.
  • The proposal lacks evidence that these deposit levels solve a measured governance problem.
  • Participation fairness and capture-risk tradeoffs are not addressed.

Пять публичных проверок

2/4

Ценность для сети

The proposal could reduce low-quality governance submissions, but it does not provide baseline spam, participation, or access evidence.

2/4

Ясность плана

The target parameter values are clear and executable, but success criteria and verification beyond execution are not defined.

1/4

Доверие к команде

Only a proposer address is supplied, with no named accountable owner or delivery evidence for this exact governance change.

2/4

Дисциплина финансирования

No Community Fund grant budget is requested, but the deposit levels lack economic justification or opportunity-cost analysis.

1/4

Риски и stewardship

The proposal does not analyze participation fairness, capture risk, spam tradeoffs, or precedent from raising proposal deposits.

Оценка команды

Execution is mostly protocol-mediated if the governance message is valid, but proposal accountability is weak because no accountable owner, monitoring path, or follow-up responsibility is provided.

Ответственный

вопрос

The proposal identifies only the submitting address, not a named accountable owner or entity.

Релевантные доказательства

неясно

No evidence is provided that the proposer has previously delivered safe governance-parameter changes.

Ресурсы и capacity

вопрос

The executable action is simple, but no capacity is shown for monitoring effects or correcting unintended outcomes.

Accountability path

провал

No reporting, contact, rollback, or escalation path is described.

Условия

  • Provide the current deposit parameters and confirm the exact post-change parameter state expected after execution.
  • Justify why 500 GNK and 1000 GNK are appropriate using evidence such as proposal spam, failed deposits, participation data, or comparable networks.
  • Assess whether the higher deposits could exclude smaller participants or increase governance capture risk.

Блокирующие проблемы

  • Нет измеримого результата: The proposal gives exact parameter values but no measurable target for governance quality, spam reduction, or participation preservation.
  • Ключевые утверждения не подтверждены: The need for these specific deposit levels is not supported by evidence or comparative analysis.
  • Нет ответственного owner: The proposal lists a submitting address but no accountable human, team, or entity for follow-up.
Источники и доказательстваShow

governance 73

SUCCEEDED

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/73
No specific evidence materials were cited by the public review.