Gonka Community Fund

Proposal простыми словами

О чем это

Team Epokha AI is building Agent Gonka, an AI agent platform using Gonka Inference, with 100+ workflows, integrations, tutorials, and demos.

Запрос

Imported tender asks reviewers to evaluate the original vote.gonka.vip proposal. Inferred ask: 0 UNKNOWN.

Ответственный

Slava MSE!

Почему это важно

Team Epokha AI is building Agent Gonka, an AI agent platform using Gonka Inference, with 100+ workflows, integrations, tutorials, and demos.

Проблема

Team Epokha AI is building Agent Gonka, an AI agent platform using Gonka Inference, with 100+ workflows, integrations, tutorials, and demos.

Что должно быть сделано

Imported tender outcome

Нужны правкиAI-черновик

Framework score v2

Простое ревью

This is a plausible ecosystem adoption idea, but it is not yet fundable as a Community Fund grant because the requested amount, budget logic, measurable outcomes, acceptance criteria, maintenance plan, and proof of delivery capacity are missing or unverified. The proposal describes building Agent Gonka with 100+ workflows, integrations, tutorials, demos, and promotion, which could create network value if it demonstrably increases useful Gonka Inference usage, but the current evidence is mostly self-described claims from the tender and the linked website could not be fetched.

Доказательства

низкие

Команда

провал

Блокеры

Почему такое мнение

The project could support Gonka adoption, but current network-level outcomes are not measurable.
The scope is ambitious and broad while proof of delivery capacity is weak.
The funding request is not evaluable because amount, budget, and tranche logic are missing.

Пять публичных проверок

2/4

Ценность для сети

Agent Gonka could increase Gonka Inference adoption, but demand, usage targets, and public-vs-private benefit are not evidenced.

1/4

Ясность плана

The proposal lists many deliverables but lacks acceptance criteria, exclusions, verification methods, and outcome metrics.

1/4

Доверие к команде

A proposer and team are named, but relevant delivery proof and capacity for a 100+ workflow platform are not verified.

0/4

Дисциплина финансирования

The grant amount, currency, budget breakdown, tranche logic, and opportunity cost are missing.

1/4

Риски и stewardship

Commercial status, conflicts, maintenance ownership, handover, and operational risks are not structured.

Оценка команды

There is a named proposer and contact path, but delivery confidence for this exact grant is low because evidence of comparable work, staffing, reporting, and maintenance is missing.

Ответственный

ок

The proposal names Team Epokha AI and proposer Slava MSE! with Discord and email contact details.

Релевантные доказательства

провал

The only product link failed to fetch and no verified prior comparable delivery evidence is provided.

Ресурсы и capacity

вопрос

The plan targets a broad platform plus 100+ agents in three months without staffing, time, or resource details.

Accountability path

вопрос

Contact details exist, but reporting cadence, milestone acceptance, maintenance, and escalation are not defined.

Условия

State the exact GNK amount requested, currency, budget lines, contributor roles, and three-month payment schedule.
Define milestone-based tranches tied to verifiable deliverables such as deployed features, integrations, workflows, tutorials, and demos.
Replace governance/vote metrics with network outcome metrics such as active users, Gonka Inference calls, retained workflows, developer signups, and published examples.

Блокирующие проблемы

Нет измеримого результата: The listed vote tally is not a network outcome metric and no usage, adoption, or inference-volume targets are defined.
Нет бюджетной или tranche-логики: The inferred ask is 0 UNKNOWN and there is no budget, milestone payment plan, or tranche logic.
Ключевые утверждения не подтверждены: Claims about the website, MVP design, architecture, and planned workflows are not backed by accessible evidence.

## 7. Team Epokha AI / epokha.ai Grant Request

О чем это

Простое ревью

Источники