Gonka Community Fund

Нужны правкиAI-черновик

Framework score v2

Простое ревью

Do not fund this in its current form. The idea of Gonka Forge could become useful network infrastructure, but the proposal does not state a funding amount, measurable outcomes, acceptance criteria, budget logic, milestones, maintenance plan, or evidence that Gonka Wallet/Forge has existing demand or usage.

Доказательства

низкие

Команда

есть вопросы

Блокеры

Почему такое мнение

The public-good thesis is plausible but not yet evidenced with demand or network-level outcomes.
The funding request is not reviewable because amount, budget, milestones, and tranche logic are missing.
The team has a visible Telegram wallet presence, but the proposal lacks proof of capacity and accountability for Gonka Forge.

Пять публичных проверок

1/4

Ценность для сети

A Gonka-powered agent/tool platform could have network value, but the proposal does not prove demand, users, or a clear network-level bottleneck.

1/4

Ясность плана

The proposal names Gonka Forge and a free AI chat, but lacks concrete deliverables, acceptance criteria, exclusions, and verifiable success metrics.

1/4

Доверие к команде

A proposer and Telegram presence are provided, but there is little evidence of this team’s ability to deliver this exact platform scope.

0/4

Дисциплина финансирования

The ask amount, currency, budget breakdown, milestones, tranches, and opportunity cost are missing.

1/4

Риски и stewardship

Conflicts, compliance risks, maintenance ownership, handover, and post-launch support are not specified.

Оценка команды

Team confidence is weak because the proposal identifies a contact but not a delivery plan, staffing model, proof of relevant shipped work, or reporting path for this grant.

Ответственный

вопрос

Slava MSE is listed as proposer with contact details, but accountable roles for the team are not defined.

Релевантные доказательства

вопрос

The Telegram page supports that Gonka Wallet exists, but it does not show usage, reliability, or prior delivery of a Forge-like platform.

Ресурсы и capacity

неясно

The proposal does not describe team members, time commitment, technical capacity, or resourcing for the three-month build.

Accountability path

вопрос

Contact information is provided, but reporting cadence, milestone review, maintenance, and escalation are missing.

Условия

State the exact GNK amount requested, currency, budget lines, milestone payments, and refund or non-payment conditions.
Define three-month deliverables with acceptance criteria, including what is in scope and out of scope for Gonka Forge.
Provide measurable success metrics such as active users, agent creators, launched agents, inference volume, task completions, retention, and target dates.

Блокирующие проблемы

Нет измеримого результата: The proposal does not define target users, transactions, agents, developers, inference usage, retention, or other outcome metrics.
Нет бюджетной или tranche-логики: The imported ask is 0 UNKNOWN and no budget, payment schedule, or tranche conditions are provided.
Ключевые утверждения не подтверждены: Claims about the wallet and future Forge platform are not backed by usage data, repository links, demos, analytics, or customer evidence.

3. Team Gonka Wallet Grant Request

Что говорит ревью

Что думает коммьюнити

Ваше мнение

О чем это

Простое ревью