Gonka Community Fund
governance: отклоненНужны правки

Internal Go-To-Market Team for 3 Month

We will run hundreds of experiments across different target audience hypotheses and set up the basis: acquisition funnels, analytics, sharable target audience deep understanding. Our key performance metric is the number of non-ru-speaking users, who pay for inference or invest in GNK. The full proposal: https://app.integrity.sh/p/SuMCnGQBhz-0asAYBUz1U

Мнение по proposal

AI-черновик

Что говорит ревью

Substantive GTM goal with useful escrow mechanics, but rejected on substance due to missing accountability and metric verification; fundable only as a restructured tranche with milestone-linked releases.

  • Network-relevant goal but unverified causal path from marketing to sustained usage
  • No accountable owner or Gonka-side acceptance party
  • Calendar-based tranches without outcome-linked release conditions
Открыть публичное ревью

Запрос

1 200 000 GNK

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1vfafh4jq674227q8j0h33fwz4jmgtxmp4vsd93; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Подано

10 июл. 2026 г.

Что думает коммьюнити

AI opinion - стартовая позиция. Ответы ниже помогают другим понять согласие, возражения и готовность голосовать.

Согласен

0

Согласен с условиями

0

Не согласен

0

Нужно больше данных

0

Ваше мнение

Governance голосование закрыто

Protocol result/status: отклонен. Здесь еще можно оставить публичный комментарий, но голосование уже не активно.

Отношение к AI opinion
Если голосовать сейчас
Посмотреть governance result

Все ответы

Ответов пока нет. Можно быть первым.

Proposal простыми словами

О чем это

We will run hundreds of experiments across different target audience hypotheses and set up the basis: acquisition funnels, analytics, sharable target audience deep understanding. Our key performance metric is the number of non-ru-speaking users, who pay for inference or invest in GNK. The full proposal: https://app.integrity.sh/p/SuMCnGQBhz-0asAYBUz1U

Запрос

1 200 000 GNK

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1vfafh4jq674227q8j0h33fwz4jmgtxmp4vsd93; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Почему это важно

Not provided as a dedicated network-level value field. Source summary: We will run hundreds of experiments across different target audience hypotheses and set up the basis: acquisition funnels, analytics, sharable target audience deep understanding. Our key performance metric is the number of non-ru-speaking users, who pay for inference or invest in GNK. The full proposal: https://app.integrity.sh/p/SuMCnGQBhz-0asAYBUz1U

Проблема

Not provided as a dedicated problem/bottleneck field. Source summary: We will run hundreds of experiments across different target audience hypotheses and set up the basis: acquisition funnels, analytics, sharable target audience deep understanding. Our key performance metric is the number of non-ru-speaking users, who pay for inference or invest in GNK. The full proposal: https://app.integrity.sh/p/SuMCnGQBhz-0asAYBUz1U

Что должно быть сделано

  • Unstructured governance deliverable

Decision readiness

Provisional AI opinion

Partial: 72 known facts exist, but 6 remaining gaps limit confidence.

Known from evidence

  • WEB_PAGE: web page: Integrity; 13351 extracted chars from rendered public page
  • GITHUB_DISCUSSION: GitHub discussion #1388 in gonka-ai/gonka: External Test Lab & Community DevNet; 6601 chars extracted from public HTML fallback.
  • GITHUB_REPO: paranjko/testlab-devnet-escrow: CosmWasm milestone escrow for the Gonka TestLab x DevNet pilot (gonka-ai/gonka discussion #1388); 0 stars, 1 forks, 0 open issues; default branch main; license unknown; pushed 2026-07-07T21:13:02Z; README extracted (4622 chars); no workflow files detected; SECURITY.md not detected
  • GITHUB_REPO: paranjko/testlab-devnet-escrow: CosmWasm milestone escrow for the Gonka TestLab x DevNet pilot (gonka-ai/gonka discussion #1388); 0 stars, 1 forks, 0 open issues; default branch main; license unknown; pushed 2026-07-07T21:13:02Z; README extracted (4622 chars); no workflow files detected; SECURITY.md not detected
  • WEB_PAGE: web page: Gonka Vote — Community proposals; 1676 extracted chars from rendered public page
  • GOVERNANCE_PROPOSAL: Canonical governance proposal source.
  • GOVERNANCE_MESSAGE: 3 executable messages; types: /cosmwasm.wasm.v1.MsgInstantiateContract2, /cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.MsgCommunityPoolSpend, /cosmwasm.wasm.v1.MsgExecuteContract; actions: OTHER, COMMUNITY_POOL_SPEND, CONTRACT_EXECUTION; funds: 1200000000000000 ngonka, 72000000000 ibc/115F68FBA220A028C6F6ED08EA0C1A9C8C52798B14FB66E6C89D5D8C06A524D4; 7 recipient-like addresses
  • GOVERNANCE_TALLY: status: PROPOSAL_STATUS_REJECTED; yes 41668; no 8; abstain 45; no-with-veto 14932; leading: yes; quorum 0.250000000000000000; threshold 0.500000000000000000; veto 0.334000000000000000

Central evidence gaps

  • No central evidence gaps.

Verify before voting

  • Fill problemBottleneck
  • Fill networkLevelValue
  • Fill scopeIncluded
  • Fill deliverableCount
  • Fill budgetLineCount
  • Fill successMetricCount
Детали оценкиShow
Нужны правкиAI-черновик

Framework score v2

Простое ревью

A 3-month go-to-market team requests 600K GNK + 36K USDT via an immutable milestone escrow with calendar-based tranches. The proposal targets non-RU speaking users who pay for inference or invest in GNK, with hundreds of experiments across communities, Reddit, SEO, B2B bizdev, and paid traffic. Six anonymous addresses receive scheduled payouts. The team cites relevant experience but no prior delivered outcomes for Gonka. Governance rejected the proposal after veto threshold was met.

Стратегическое мнение

полезно с условиями

Substantive GTM goal with useful escrow mechanics, but rejected on substance due to missing accountability and metric verification; fundable only as a restructured tranche with milestone-linked releases.

Тип решения

трата казны

Правильная форма

транши / milestones

Полезно если

The team commits to verifiable non-RU user acquisition with on-chain attribution, publishes recipient identities and roles, and ties tranche releases to verified metric milestones rather than calendar days.

Главный риск

No named delivery owner, no Gonka-side acceptance owner, no verifiable milestone criteria, and aspirational KPIs without baselines or attribution method.

Риск прецедента: Approving a 1.2M GNK marketing spend without metric-linked releases would set a precedent for vague GTM grants with calendar-based payouts.

Что сделает fundable

  • Name a Gonka-side acceptance owner with authority to verify outcomes and clawback
  • Link each tranche release to verified non-RU paying user or investor count with attribution methodology
  • Publish recipient identities, roles, and prior delivery proof for each address
  • Include baseline measurement and third-party verification path for KPIs

Доказательства

низкие

Команда

провал

Блокеры

3

Почему такое мнение

  • Network-relevant goal but unverified causal path from marketing to sustained usage
  • No accountable owner or Gonka-side acceptance party
  • Calendar-based tranches without outcome-linked release conditions

Пять публичных проверок

2/4

Ценность для сети

User growth is network-relevant, but the causal path from marketing experiments to sustained inference demand is unproven and targets are aspirational without baselines.

1/4

Ясность плана

Activities are listed but experiments lack bounded scope, success criteria, or attribution method; 'hundreds of experiments' is not a verifiable deliverable.

1/4

Доверие к команде

Named individuals have relevant backgrounds but no evidence of delivering this exact scope for Gonka; delivery owner and Gonka-side acceptance owner are both missing.

2/4

Дисциплина финансирования

Escrow contract with tranches and clawback is structurally sound, but tranches are calendar-based not outcome-based, and total ask is large relative to unverified claims.

1/4

Риски и stewardship

Immutable escrow reduces mutability risk but concentrates risk in initial config; anonymous recipients, no milestone criteria, and no sell-limit enforcement on-chain are unaddressed.

Оценка команды

Named individuals have relevant marketing and startup experience, but no Gonka-side acceptance owner, no prior delivery proof for this scope, and anonymous on-chain recipients obscure accountability.

Ответственный

вопрос

Protocol proposer is named but accountable delivery owner for this exact proposal is not provided; Gonka-side acceptance owner is absent.

Релевантные доказательства

вопрос

Team members cite impressive prior roles but no evidence of delivering equivalent GTM outcomes for decentralized inference networks.

Ресурсы и capacity

вопрос

Team size of 8-15 with external agencies suggests variable capacity; no evidence of committed time or exclusivity.

Accountability path

провал

No reporting cadence, no escalation path, no maintenance handover, and six anonymous addresses with unstated identities.

Условия

  • Name a Gonka-side acceptance owner with clawback authority
  • Publish recipient identities, roles, and responsibilities for all six addresses
  • Replace calendar tranches with metric-linked releases verified by on-chain or third-party attribution

Блокирующие проблемы

  • Нет ответственного owner: No named delivery owner with explicit responsibility for outcomes; protocol proposer is not assigned delivery role.
  • Нет измеримого результата: KPI of 'non-ru-speaking users who pay or invest' lacks baseline, attribution method, measurement cadence, and third-party verification.
  • Ключевые утверждения не подтверждены: Claims of 'hundreds of experiments' and prior achievements are unsupported by delivery evidence for this network.
Источники и доказательстваShow

governance 85

REJECTED

https://gonkascan.com/?page=governance&proposal_id=85

Evidence used in the opinion

Governance executable messages

3 executable messages; types: /cosmwasm.wasm.v1.MsgInstantiateContract2, /cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.MsgCommunityPoolSpend, /cosmwasm.wasm.v1.MsgExecuteContract; actions: OTHER, COMMUNITY_POOL_SPEND, CONTRACT_EXECUTION; funds: 1200000000000000 ngonka, 72000000000 ibc/115F68FBA220A028C6F6ED08EA0C1A9C8C52798B14FB66E6C89D5D8C06A524D4; 7 recipient-like addresses

https://gonkascan.com/?page=governance&proposal_id=85

GOVERNANCE source

Canonical governance proposal source.

https://gonkascan.com/?page=governance&proposal_id=85

Integrity

web page: Integrity; 13351 extracted chars from rendered public page

https://app.integrity.sh/p/SuMCnGQBhz-0asAYBUz1U