Bring Gonka to EBC12 as a Gold Sponsor
Fund Gonka’s Gold Sponsor participation at European Blockchain Convention 2026 in Barcelona to expand Gonka’s European presence, meet institutional decision-makers, exchanges, infrastructure partners
Запрос
62 000 USDT
Ответственный
Heydar Naghiyev
Подано
21 мая 2026 г.
Advanced vote context
Reviewer median
45.25
Raw score
45.25
Final score
45.25
Reviewer scorecards
| Criterion | Weight | Value | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Strategic bottleneck The proposal identifies a plausible strategic bottleneck: Gonka's underdeveloped European presence and need for institutional/exchange/infrastructure access. The bottleneck is credible but not backed by baseline market data or evidence of missed opportunities. Evidence
| 14 | 0.75 | 10.5 |
Network-level leverage A Gold Sponsorship could provide leverage via booth presence, speaking slots, executive meetings, newsletter/social exposure, and content assets. However, expected downstream conversion to network usage is not specified. Evidence
| 13 | 0.75 | 9.75 |
Measurable impact Impact claims are mostly qualitative. The only structured metric concerns tender voting, not event outcomes or business-development results. Evidence
| 12 | 0.25 | 3 |
Team / execution reliability | 15 | Team module | 7.75 |
Scope / deliverables The package deliverables are detailed enough to understand what is being purchased, but acceptance criteria, exclusions, roles, and milestone verification are missing. Evidence
| 10 | 0.75 | 7.5 |
Funding structure / tranches There is no tranche structure, payment schedule, deposit/final-payment logic, milestone gating, cancellation protection, or refund handling. Evidence
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Budget discipline The total ask is clear, but there is no itemized cost basis, comparable pricing, package quote, discount, negotiation record, or separation of sponsorship fee from optional expenses. Evidence
| 7 | 0.25 | 1.75 |
Incentive alignment The proposer is affiliated with EBC, the direct seller of the sponsorship package. This conflict is disclosed in comments but not in structured proposal fields, and payment appears tied to purchasing the package rather than measurable Gonka outcomes. Evidence
| 8 | 0.25 | 2 |
Sustainability / handover No plan is provided for post-event reporting, content reuse, lead/contact handover, follow-up ownership, CRM tracking, or conversion accountability. Evidence
| 7 | 0.25 | 1.75 |
Governance precedent / opportunity cost The proposal requests a significant lump sum for sponsorship without providing alternatives, opportunity-cost analysis, or comparison against other European activation options. This could set a precedent for vendor-led event sponsorships with weak outcome accountability. Evidence
| 5 | 0.25 | 1.25 |
| Raw score | 45.25 | ||
This is a plausible demand-activation proposal for Gonka to gain European visibility through EBC12 Gold Sponsorship, with a detailed list of package inclusions and a clearly named EBC-side proposer. However, it is materially incomplete for Community Fund approval: no Gonka-side commercial owner is named, no event-success metrics are defined, no budget breakdown or tranches are provided, no milestones or acceptance criteria are normalized, conflicts are only disclosed in comments, and risk/ROI handling is weak. The strongest parts are strategic relevance and package specificity; the weakest parts are measurement, funding discipline, capacity commitment, and post-event accountability. Reviewer questions: - Who is the named Gonka-side accountable commercial owner for the sponsorship, booth, meetings, lead qualification, and post-event follow-up? - Which founders/senior leaders or official representatives will attend, and what time commitment is confirmed? - Can EBC provide an itemized quote or sponsorship contract showing what the 62,000 USDT covers and any taxes, discounts, refund/cancellation terms, or payment schedule? - What are the measurable success criteria: number of completed executive meetings, qualified leads, follow-up calls, partner opportunities, content views, or signed outcomes? - Can payment be structured in tranches tied to contract execution, delivery of booth/speaking/meeting assets, and post-event reporting? - What is the conflict disclosure and approval process given that the proposer represents EBC, the direct seller of the package? - What alternatives were considered, such as smaller sponsorship, attendance-only, side event, targeted roadshow, or other European conferences? - Who owns and receives post-event assets including photos, recordings, attendee/lead lists, meeting notes, and follow-up pipeline? - What mitigation exists if the 7 curated executive meetings are low-quality, cancelled, or not relevant to Gonka? - What post-event report will be delivered to the community and by what date?
Optional voter scorecard
Relevant delivery proof
Weight 4
Domain fit
Weight 3
Technical / operational capability
Weight 3
Commitment / capacity
Weight 2
Governance communication
Weight 2
Maintenance accountability
Weight 1
Strategic bottleneck
Weight 14
Network-level leverage
Weight 13
Measurable impact
Weight 12
Team / execution reliability
Weight 15
Scope / deliverables
Weight 10
Funding structure / tranches
Weight 9
Budget discipline
Weight 7
Incentive alignment
Weight 8
Sustainability / handover
Weight 7
Governance precedent / opportunity cost
Weight 5