Gonka Community Fund
governance: успешенНужны правки

TheSoul - Offer 1.2: Brandbook (20,000 USDT)

Brand identity system for Gonka.AI: logo, typography, color system, graphic language, layout principles, and templates, built on the positioning from Offer 1.1. Single-tranche payment of 20,000 USDT to TheSoul on proposal pass. Full offer document: see the metadata URL.

Мнение по proposal

AI-черновик

Что говорит ревью

The proposal asks for a single-tranche 20,000 USDT payment to TheSoul for a Gonka.AI brandbook covering logo, typography, color system, graphic language, layout principles, and templates. The work could plausibly help the network if the brand system becomes a reusable public asset, but the supplied evidence is too thin for Community Fund allocation as written: no measurable outcomes, no acceptance criteria, no budget breakdown, no milestones/tranches, no reporting path, no maintenance/licensing handover, and no evidence that TheSoul can deliver this exact scope. Recommendation: needs revision before funding.

  • Plausible public asset, but network-level value is not tied to a concrete bottleneck, adoption plan, or measurable outcome.
  • The plan is not sufficiently verifiable: deliverable categories exist, but acceptance criteria, metrics, timeline, exclusions, and handover are missing.
  • The funding design is weak: 20,000 USDT is paid in one tranche on proposal pass with no budget logic or milestone controls.
Открыть публичное ревью

Запрос

20 000 USDT

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1s3tnqglxt6xwy9ttuedtz8cp4x9tlwp8sdcvvm; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Подано

2 июн. 2026 г.

Что думает коммьюнити

AI opinion - стартовая позиция. Ответы ниже помогают другим понять согласие, возражения и готовность голосовать.

Согласен

0

Согласен с условиями

0

Не согласен

0

Нужно больше данных

0

Ваше мнение

Governance голосование закрыто

Protocol result/status: успешен. Здесь еще можно оставить публичный комментарий, но голосование уже не активно.

Отношение к AI opinion
Если голосовать сейчас
Посмотреть governance result

Все ответы

Ответов пока нет. Можно быть первым.

Proposal простыми словами

О чем это

Brand identity system for Gonka.AI: logo, typography, color system, graphic language, layout principles, and templates, built on the positioning from Offer 1.1. Single-tranche payment of 20,000 USDT to TheSoul on proposal pass. Full offer document: see the metadata URL.

Запрос

20 000 USDT

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1s3tnqglxt6xwy9ttuedtz8cp4x9tlwp8sdcvvm; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Почему это важно

Not provided as a dedicated network-level value field. Source summary: Brand identity system for Gonka.AI: logo, typography, color system, graphic language, layout principles, and templates, built on the positioning from Offer 1.1. Single-tranche payment of 20,000 USDT to TheSoul on proposal pass. Full offer document: see the metadata URL.

Проблема

Not provided as a dedicated problem/bottleneck field. Source summary: Brand identity system for Gonka.AI: logo, typography, color system, graphic language, layout principles, and templates, built on the positioning from Offer 1.1. Single-tranche payment of 20,000 USDT to TheSoul on proposal pass. Full offer document: see the metadata URL.

Что должно быть сделано

  • Unstructured governance deliverable

Связанный пакет proposals

TheSoul: пакет proposals

6 связанных proposals

Эти proposals похожи на одну программу, разделенную на несколько governance votes. Текущий proposal нужно оценивать отдельно, но также проверить общего owner, общую бюджетную логику, shared metrics и зависимости.

Запрос пакета

128 000 GNK

Запрос пакета

105 000 USDT

Показать связанные proposals и фокус проверки пакета
ProposalGovernanceЗапросСтатусОценкаМнение
Offer 1.1
TheSoul - Offer 1.1: Brand positioning (25,000 USDT)
#6025 000 USDT
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
0Нужны правки
Offer 1.2текущий
TheSoul - Offer 1.2: Brandbook (20,000 USDT)
#6120 000 USDT
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
13.25Нужны правки
Offer 1.3
TheSoul - Offer 1.3: Influencer pilot (50,000 USDT)
#6250 000 USDT
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
14.5Нужны правки
Offer 2.1
TheSoul - Offer 2.1: Website and landings (10,000 USDT)
#6310 000 USDT
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
15Нужны правки
Offer 2.2
TheSoul - Offer 2.2: Analytics and attribution (28,000 GNK)
#6428 000 GNK
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
15.75Нужны правки
Offer 2.3
TheSoul - Offer 2.3: Digital strategy (100,000 GNK)
#65100 000 GNK
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
12.25Нужны правки

Что проверить по пакету

  • Одна консолидированная логика для всего пакета.
  • Общие метрики, которые доказывают эффект combined spend.
  • Понятное разделение бюджета между proposals, currencies и tranches.
  • Названный owner для dependencies, reporting и accountability.
Детали оценкиShow
Нужны правкиAI-черновик

Framework score v2

Простое ревью

The proposal asks for a single-tranche 20,000 USDT payment to TheSoul for a Gonka.AI brandbook covering logo, typography, color system, graphic language, layout principles, and templates. The work could plausibly help the network if the brand system becomes a reusable public asset, but the supplied evidence is too thin for Community Fund allocation as written: no measurable outcomes, no acceptance criteria, no budget breakdown, no milestones/tranches, no reporting path, no maintenance/licensing handover, and no evidence that TheSoul can deliver this exact scope. Recommendation: needs revision before funding.

Доказательства

средние

Команда

провал

Блокеры

4

Почему такое мнение

  • Plausible public asset, but network-level value is not tied to a concrete bottleneck, adoption plan, or measurable outcome.
  • The plan is not sufficiently verifiable: deliverable categories exist, but acceptance criteria, metrics, timeline, exclusions, and handover are missing.
  • The funding design is weak: 20,000 USDT is paid in one tranche on proposal pass with no budget logic or milestone controls.

Пять публичных проверок

1/4

Ценность для сети

A network-level brandbook for Gonka.AI is plausibly useful, and the proposal names concrete brand-system components. However, the supplied text does not define the strategic bottleneck, why this is urgent, expected network-level outcomes, or how the brandbook will be adopted by builders, governance, validators, or ecosystem projects.

1/4

Ясность плана

The proposal lists deliverable categories, but does not provide acceptance criteria, scope exclusions, timeline, revision process, file formats, licensing terms, verification path, or success metrics. The canonical proposal says the full offer is at the metadata URL, but the full issue-thread offer text is not included in the extracted evidence corpus.

1/4

Доверие к команде

TheSoul is named as recipient and apparent delivery entity, but the supplied evidence does not include a named accountable individual, portfolio samples, comparable brand-system delivery proof, staffing/capacity, reporting cadence, or escalation path for this exact ask.

0/4

Дисциплина финансирования

The ask is a 20,000 USDT lump-sum payment on proposal pass. No cost breakdown, pricing logic, tranche plan, milestone acceptance, holdback, or opportunity-cost comparison is provided in the supplied evidence. This is weak for future creative work because the fund would pay before verified delivery.

1/4

Риски и stewardship

Executable transfer context is available, but the supplied excerpt does not include the recipient address or full raw message JSON. The proposal also lacks conflict disclosure, licensing/ownership terms, maintenance or handover plan, risk mitigations, and reporting. The governance tally is voting context only and should not be treated as quality evidence.

Оценка команды

TheSoul is identifiable as the recipient/proposer entity, but team confidence remains low because the evidence does not show who is accountable day-to-day, why this team is qualified for this exact brandbook, what capacity is committed, or how the community can verify and escalate delivery.

Ответственный

вопрос

TheSoul is named as recipient, but no named accountable delivery owner or individual contact is provided in the supplied evidence.

Релевантные доказательства

провал

No portfolio, prior comparable brandbook, case study, client reference, or sample work is included in the supplied extracted evidence.

Ресурсы и capacity

неясно

The proposal does not disclose team members, time allocation, schedule, resource plan, or capacity for delivery.

Accountability path

провал

No reporting cadence, review checkpoints, acceptance workflow, contact path, dispute process, or post-delivery obligation is provided in the supplied evidence.

Условия

  • Provide the full offer text in the review record, including exact deliverables, file formats, revision rounds, exclusions, timeline, dependencies on Offer 1.1, and acceptance criteria.
  • Replace the single upfront payment with milestone-based tranches, for example: discovery/creative direction, draft identity system, community review, final brandbook/templates, and handover; include acceptance gates before payment.
  • Add measurable success and verification criteria, such as publication of source files, template usability checks, number of ecosystem teams onboarded, adoption targets, and a public delivery report.

Блокирующие проблемы

  • Нет измеримого результата: The proposal does not provide baseline, target, measurement method, acceptance criteria, adoption target, or any other outcome metric for the brandbook.
  • Нет бюджетной или tranche-логики: The proposal requests 20,000 USDT as a single payment on proposal pass without budget breakdown or milestone gating.
  • Ключевые утверждения не подтверждены: The proposal depends on TheSoul delivering a professional brand identity system, but the supplied evidence does not include relevant capability proof or detailed offer terms.
Источники и доказательстваShow

governance 61

SUCCEEDED

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/61

Evidence used in the opinion

ADME-CY-LTD/thesoul-gonka-proposals

ADME-CY-LTD/thesoul-gonka-proposals: Six Cosmos SDK governance proposals submitted to the Gonka chain by TheSoul Group.; 0 stars, 0 forks, 7 open issues; default branch main; license unknown; pushed 2026-05-28T12:53:37Z; README extracted (1646 chars); no workflow files detected; SECURITY.md not detected

https://github.com/ADME-CY-LTD/thesoul-gonka-proposals

Governance executable messages

1 executable message; types: /cosmwasm.wasm.v1.MsgExecuteContract; actions: CONTRACT_EXECUTION; funds: 20000000000 ibc/115F68FBA220A028C6F6ED08EA0C1A9C8C52798B14FB66E6C89D5D8C06A524D4; 1 recipient-like address

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/61

Gonkascan governance proposal

Canonical governance proposal source.

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/61

Governance final tally

status: PROPOSAL_STATUS_PASSED; yes 220798; no 0; abstain 34369; no-with-veto 70043; leading: yes; quorum 0.25; threshold 0.500000000000000000; veto 0.334000000000000000

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/61