Gonka Community Fund
governance: успешенНужны правки

TheSoul - Offer 2.2: Analytics and attribution (28,000 GNK)

Web analytics, attribution, and funnel dashboarding for Gonka.AI: GA4 implementation, UTM taxonomy, event tracking, and conversion reporting. Single-tranche payment of 28,000 GNK to TheSoul on proposal pass. Full offer document: see the metadata URL.

Мнение по proposal

AI-черновик

Что говорит ревью

The proposal asks the Community Fund to pay TheSoul 28,000 GNK in a single tranche for Gonka.AI analytics and attribution work, including GA4 implementation, UTM taxonomy, event tracking, and conversion reporting. The work is plausibly useful to the network because better attribution and funnel reporting can create decision-useful knowledge, but the submitted evidence does not define the bottleneck, success metrics, baselines, acceptance criteria, budget logic, reporting cadence, maintenance owner, or relevant delivery proof. As written, the fund would be paying upfront for a general work category rather than verifiable network-level outcomes.

  • Plausible network usefulness, but the proposal does not convert analytics work into verifiable network-level outcomes.
  • Payment is a full single-tranche community pool spend with no budget breakdown or milestone controls.
  • Team accountability and relevant delivery proof are not established for this exact scope.
Открыть публичное ревью

Запрос

28 000 GNK

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1s3tnqglxt6xwy9ttuedtz8cp4x9tlwp8sdcvvm; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Подано

2 июн. 2026 г.

Что думает коммьюнити

AI opinion - стартовая позиция. Ответы ниже помогают другим понять согласие, возражения и готовность голосовать.

Согласен

0

Согласен с условиями

0

Не согласен

0

Нужно больше данных

0

Ваше мнение

Governance голосование закрыто

Protocol result/status: успешен. Здесь еще можно оставить публичный комментарий, но голосование уже не активно.

Отношение к AI opinion
Если голосовать сейчас
Посмотреть governance result

Все ответы

Ответов пока нет. Можно быть первым.

Proposal простыми словами

О чем это

Web analytics, attribution, and funnel dashboarding for Gonka.AI: GA4 implementation, UTM taxonomy, event tracking, and conversion reporting. Single-tranche payment of 28,000 GNK to TheSoul on proposal pass. Full offer document: see the metadata URL.

Запрос

28 000 GNK

Ответственный

Protocol proposer gonka1s3tnqglxt6xwy9ttuedtz8cp4x9tlwp8sdcvvm; accountable delivery owner not explicitly provided.

Почему это важно

Not provided as a dedicated network-level value field. Source summary: Web analytics, attribution, and funnel dashboarding for Gonka.AI: GA4 implementation, UTM taxonomy, event tracking, and conversion reporting. Single-tranche payment of 28,000 GNK to TheSoul on proposal pass. Full offer document: see the metadata URL.

Проблема

Not provided as a dedicated problem/bottleneck field. Source summary: Web analytics, attribution, and funnel dashboarding for Gonka.AI: GA4 implementation, UTM taxonomy, event tracking, and conversion reporting. Single-tranche payment of 28,000 GNK to TheSoul on proposal pass. Full offer document: see the metadata URL.

Что должно быть сделано

  • Unstructured governance deliverable

Связанный пакет proposals

TheSoul: пакет proposals

6 связанных proposals

Эти proposals похожи на одну программу, разделенную на несколько governance votes. Текущий proposal нужно оценивать отдельно, но также проверить общего owner, общую бюджетную логику, shared metrics и зависимости.

Запрос пакета

128 000 GNK

Запрос пакета

105 000 USDT

Показать связанные proposals и фокус проверки пакета
ProposalGovernanceЗапросСтатусОценкаМнение
#6025 000 USDT
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
0Нужны правки
#6120 000 USDT
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
13.25Нужны правки
#6250 000 USDT
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
14.5Нужны правки
#6310 000 USDT
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
15Нужны правки
#6428 000 GNK
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
15.75Нужны правки
#65100 000 GNK
нужно обновитьgovernance: успешен
12.25Нужны правки

Что проверить по пакету

  • Одна консолидированная логика для всего пакета.
  • Общие метрики, которые доказывают эффект combined spend.
  • Понятное разделение бюджета между proposals, currencies и tranches.
  • Названный owner для dependencies, reporting и accountability.
Детали оценкиShow
Нужны правкиAI-черновик

Framework score v2

Простое ревью

The proposal asks the Community Fund to pay TheSoul 28,000 GNK in a single tranche for Gonka.AI analytics and attribution work, including GA4 implementation, UTM taxonomy, event tracking, and conversion reporting. The work is plausibly useful to the network because better attribution and funnel reporting can create decision-useful knowledge, but the submitted evidence does not define the bottleneck, success metrics, baselines, acceptance criteria, budget logic, reporting cadence, maintenance owner, or relevant delivery proof. As written, the fund would be paying upfront for a general work category rather than verifiable network-level outcomes.

Доказательства

средние

Команда

провал

Блокеры

4

Почему такое мнение

  • Plausible network usefulness, but the proposal does not convert analytics work into verifiable network-level outcomes.
  • Payment is a full single-tranche community pool spend with no budget breakdown or milestone controls.
  • Team accountability and relevant delivery proof are not established for this exact scope.

Пять публичных проверок

2/4

Ценность для сети

Analytics and attribution for Gonka.AI could create network-level value by improving measurement of acquisition and conversion funnels. However, the proposal does not state the current bottleneck, why now, which network decisions the dashboards will improve, or what measurable network outcomes should change.

1/4

Ясность плана

The proposal lists broad deliverable categories, but lacks acceptance criteria, exclusions, implementation timeline, baseline/target metrics, measurement method, and verification path. For an analytics grant, the absence of measurable success criteria is a major weakness.

1/4

Доверие к команде

The recipient/entity TheSoul is named, but the accountable delivery owner, relevant proof of similar analytics implementation, capacity, reporting contact, and maintenance accountability are not evidenced. Reputation or proposer identity is not enough to establish delivery confidence for this exact scope.

1/4

Дисциплина финансирования

The amount and payment mechanism are clear, and the README implies the 28,000 GNK ask equals about $7,000 at the stated reference rate. But there is no budget breakdown, no milestone/tranche logic, no acceptance-gated payment, and no opportunity-cost comparison. A full upfront payment on proposal pass is weak funding discipline for future work.

1/4

Риски и stewardship

The executable action type and amount are visible, which helps payment review. However, the proposal does not disclose conflicts, implementation risks, data/privacy assumptions for analytics tooling, dashboard ownership, credential handover, ongoing maintenance, or transparency/reporting obligations.

Оценка команды

Team confidence is weak for this exact ask. TheSoul is named as the recipient/proposal entity, but the evidence does not name the delivery lead, provide relevant analytics/dashboard implementation proof, define capacity, or create a reporting and maintenance path.

Ответственный

вопрос

TheSoul is named as the recipient and proposal-set submitter, but no individual accountable delivery owner or operational contact is provided in the usable evidence.

Релевантные доказательства

провал

No evidence is provided that TheSoul has previously delivered GA4 implementations, attribution systems, UTM taxonomies, event tracking, or conversion dashboards for comparable projects.

Ресурсы и capacity

неясно

The proposal does not disclose staffing, time commitment, implementation schedule, access dependencies, or capacity to support the analytics stack after launch.

Accountability path

провал

No reporting cadence, acceptance review process, credential handover, maintenance commitment, contact path, or escalation path is provided in the usable evidence.

Условия

  • Provide the full offer content in durable, reviewable form, including scope, exclusions, implementation timeline, dependencies, and acceptance criteria.
  • Name an accountable delivery owner and operational contact for TheSoul, including who controls implementation, who reports to governance, and who maintains the analytics setup after delivery.
  • Define measurable success criteria: current baseline, target state, event taxonomy coverage, tested conversion events, dashboards delivered, reporting cadence, and verification method.

Блокирующие проблемы

  • Нет измеримого результата: The proposal is for analytics and attribution but does not provide baseline, target, measurement method, dashboard acceptance criteria, or post-delivery success metrics.
  • Нет бюджетной или tranche-логики: The ask is a single-tranche 28,000 GNK payment on pass with no budget breakdown, milestone gating, or acceptance-linked disbursement.
  • Ключевые утверждения не подтверждены: The proposal depends on broad claims that TheSoul can deliver analytics and attribution work, but the corpus contains no relevant delivery proof, technical plan, or acceptance testing evidence.
Источники и доказательстваShow

Evidence used in the opinion

ADME-CY-LTD/thesoul-gonka-proposals

ADME-CY-LTD/thesoul-gonka-proposals: Six Cosmos SDK governance proposals submitted to the Gonka chain by TheSoul Group.; 0 stars, 0 forks, 7 open issues; default branch main; license unknown; pushed 2026-05-28T12:53:37Z; README extracted (1646 chars); no workflow files detected; SECURITY.md not detected

https://github.com/ADME-CY-LTD/thesoul-gonka-proposals

Governance executable messages

1 executable message; types: /cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.MsgCommunityPoolSpend; actions: COMMUNITY_POOL_SPEND; funds: 28000000000000 ngonka; 1 recipient-like address

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/64

Gonkascan governance proposal

Canonical governance proposal source.

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/64

Governance final tally

status: PROPOSAL_STATUS_PASSED; yes 220798; no 0; abstain 34369; no-with-veto 70043; leading: yes; quorum 0.25; threshold 0.500000000000000000; veto 0.334000000000000000

https://gonkascan.com/network/proposals/64